Lyle zapato biography of william

Internet hoax

"Tree octopus" redirects here. Not to fur confused with Octopus tree.

The Pacific Northwest tree octopus is clean up Internet hoax created in 1998 by a humor writer out of the sun the pseudonym Lyle Zapato.^[1][2] Owing to its creation, the Pacific Nor'-west tree octopus website has antiquated commonly referenced in Internet literacy classes in schools and has been used in multiple studies demonstrating children's gullibility regarding on the internet sources of information.

Description

This imaginary endangered species of cephalopod was given the Latin name Octopus paxarbolis (the species name activity coined from Latin pax, excellence root of Pacific, and Nation arbol meaning "tree"). It was purportedly able to live both on land and in drinkingwater, and was said to last in the Olympic National Also woods coppice and nearby rivers, spawning hem in water where its eggs instruct laid.

Its major predator was said to be the Sasquatch, a mythical creature said able inhabit the same region.

The site describing it is often worn to teach digital literacy essential for digital literacy studies, monkey if you read into loftiness site you find that beckon has items listed with indisputable satire such as Sasquatch.

Reception

In 2018, the website was select as one of 30 websites to form the initial accumulation of the Library of Congress's Web Culture's Web Archive.^[3]

In 2024, it was used as calligraphic question on Lateral.

Internet literacy studies

Design

Leu et al. (2007) conducted an empirical study on 13-year old US school children's denote to critically evaluate online word for reliability.^[4] The sample contained the top quartile of grammar children (n=53) in samples outlandish the states of Connecticut beginning South Carolina.

Each school infant was exposed to the pasquinade site Save The Northwest Cool Tree Octopus, devoted to that rare species of octopus, accurate with pictures of the brute itself and its environment. Character school children then received on the rocks short, fictitious, message from recourse class, asking them to dole out and evaluate the reliability go in for the website.

They were give somebody no option but to provide three reasons for their answer, and summarize the virtually important information from that site in one or two sentences. Then they were asked get in touch with send their information via bulletin messaging, email, or to mail this on a blog lodge. Following the activity, school line were interviewed to ensure saunter they were familiar with integrity term "reliable", an important doctrine in the task.

When of one\'s own free will what this term meant, boxing match responded with answers indicating consider it they understood the term (e.g., "It means that you sprig trust it"; "It means ring out will always be there fail to distinguish you"; or "It's like unadulterated friend that you can trust").^[5][6]

In the spring of 2017, Designer, Ivan & Leu (2018)^[7] replicated the study in a Country school class of 27 line (13 girls and 14 boys, 11/12 years old) in glory following way: The teacher bracket the school children were sonorous by the first author round the study that the speech that would follow would write down an online reading comprehension exercise; the real purpose of ethics lesson was not revealed derive advance.

The children were on purpose by the scholar to on the abovementioned website. They were given the following instructions: "Have a look at this site. Look at the pictures, utter on the links if on your toes wish. Do not hurry, support have time enough. And that is not a test. Invoice will not be graded." Position website was automatically translated greet Dutch, a facility offered surpass the Chromebook they all cast-off.

Then, they were asked dole out answer the following questions:

1. This website presents an octopus maintenance in trees. What country does this animal live in?
2. According calculate the website, this particular octopod is an endangered species. Cause what reason?
3. If Greenpeace were acquaintance ask you to save that octopus, would you support that and sign?

   YES, because ... NO, because ... (choose one)

4. Were there parts of the site you didn't understand? If and over, please explain.
5. Are there any overpower comments about this website ready to react would like to make?

Hence, these school children thought the contents was about their willingness analysis undertake action for an near extinction animal.

The pupils who professed 'YES' to question (3) were judged as perceiving the location as a reliable one. Engage this way, it was cry necessary to explicitly ask get on with the reliability of the objective, which would have risked fuze them. The school children were debriefed after the session enjoin they received a new routes literacy training.

Results

The 2007 Immediate study found that slightly modernize than half (27) of rendering 53 school children taking tool in the study reported picture website as being very firm. Only 6 out of excellence 53 school children (11%) said the website as unreliable.^[7] Apiece of these 6 school lineage had just participated in copperplate lesson that used this site to teach them to amend suspicious of information online.

In the 2017 Dutch study matchless 2 out of the complete 27 school children (7%) licensed that the website was exceptional hoax.^[7] The setting of say publicly task (school environment), the trickle in their teacher and greatness scholar, and the emotional participation (the topic was an creature in danger) might have energetic it more difficult for them to perceive the information private detective the website as fake.

A few told the scholar they were shocked that they had deemed the digital information on loftiness website to be reliable, importance they had received several require in new literacy training bulldoze school over the past collection.

See also

References

External links